This review was written on December 16th 2010
John Hill is a
practising Jungian psychotherapist who lives in Zurich. He is a close friend of my brother-in-law Mark Hederman since they were at school together in Glenstal and his family
were close to my wife, Louise, Mark and the Hederman family in earlier years.
He was trained in philosophy in Dublin University and the Catholic University
of America.
The title provides
the full sense of what Hill wishes to convey in the wider sense of home and
homelessness but those of us who are not familiar with Jungian psychology will
find problems of interpretation and of insights in the earlier chapters. One professional colleague writes on
the back cover of the book as follows
The work offers a profound philosophical and psychological
exploration of the multi-dimensional significance of home and the interwoven
themes of homelessness and homesickness in contemporary global culture. Home is
a particular dwelling place, as a cultural or national identity, as a safe
temenos (a sacred enclosure or precinct, according my Random House dictionary-
RM) in therapy, and as a metaphor for the individuation process are (sic) analysed expertly from
multi-disciplinary perspectives and, more poignantly, through the sharing of
diverse narratives that bear witness to lives lived and endured from memories
of homes lost and regained.
Gaia: Primordial Goddess of the earth or Mother Earth |
The theme is
home in every sense from the individual family to the planet’s role as Gaia,
the home of humanity. (He does not use the word Gaia as popularised by James
Lovelock in describing our planet home - RM.) The author touches on his own
somewhat dysfunctional family, his many changes of home and home’s
circumstances during his training and after his thirty years of professional
life in Switzerland where he married, had a family, divorced and worked as a
deeply committed Jungian psychotherapist.
A meaningful and
comprehensive review of John Hill’s text would require me to reread the
chapters dealing with the more arcane language of his profession. In his final
chapter he returns to Jung and his dreams. He writes
One of Jung’s dreams, evocative of the vertical axis of home, suggests
that the human psyche harbors (sic) to embrace the entirety of evolution. The
dream inspired him to envisage the human personality as a many storied house,
which is still in the process of being built. The top floor would symbolise the
conscious personality, but as one descends, one discovers other stories
containing relics of a historical consciousness. Already Jung’s description of
his 1912 dream makes this kind of experience.
And the author
goes on to explain:
It was as though we had to describe and explain a building whose
upper storey was erected in the nineteenth century, the ground floor dates back
to the sixteenth century, and careful examination of the masonry reveals that
it was reconstructed from a tower built in the eleventh century. In the cellar
we come upon Roman foundations and under the cellar a choked up cave with
Neolithic tools ---- that would be the picture of our psychic structure. We live on the upper storey and are
only aware that the lower storey is a little old-fashioned. As to what lies
beneath the earth’s surface, of that we remain totally unconscious.
I leave the more arcane aspects of Hill’s chapters on the conscious and unconscious and I deal more with his chapters which include his protean description of the home in its many forms. Home can be related to the closely-knit family, it can refer to a community or nation and is thus related to our commitment to nationality; it can refer to various structures in society, the professions, and political movements, or to humanity as a whole as in the Gaia concept. In the individual, home may change as one ages, as one’s family’s circumstances change and as one adopts a career and changes location. No doubt one’s original childhood and early home will remain a powerful part of one’s consciousness but in to-day’s climate the rapid increase in immigration worldwide raises huge problems contributing to the trauma of homelessness, a factor dealt with in detail in chapter 10 and 11, At home in a Global Society and Traversing Cultural Boundaries. Hill dissects in detail the many problems the immigrants face and the many problems faced by their host nation
Hill states that
homelessness appears with many faces: overpopulation, intolerance, poverty, civil
strife, the concentration of wealth among the few. He mentions the speed of
information, and the ease of transportation which has unleashed world
migrations of unparalleled dimensions. He proposes some of the solutions which
may be employed to overcome the immigrants’ language, cultural and emotional
needs, not to mention loss of possessions and separation from home and nation. Hill
states that much can be learned from the psychotherapist’s and social worker’s
engagement with immigrant populations and clearly the author is deeply
concerned with our current situation.
Although, even
with such professional inputs, the lot of the immigrant nowadays cannot easily
be solved. Hill talks about the methodology of coping with increasing immigration
but the possible solutions which he puts forward surely ignores the cause of
this world trend, that is, a burgeoning human population which fails to realise
the limitations of Nature on which we depend for our existence and which must
add to or, more likely, accelerate the fundamental cause of our woes. And a rise
in the oceans of one metre will increase the current high rate of immigration
by a hundred fold. The author’s two chapters described so comprehensively about
world immigration must add further warning to us of the threat to humanity.
Chapter 12 Ireland
Contemplating a Nation from a Place of Exile
provides an interesting insight into Irish nationalism, and particularly into our
recent revolutionary period and the Northern situation. It is relevant because
of the author’s birth in Ireland and of his Irish family. His views on
nationalism as the font of revolutionary violence and of alienation of Irish
society are very close to my own.
He states that
Nationalist movements in Ireland have long sought to legitimise their ideals
and objections by referring to the ancestral myths of Celtic heroism, to wit,
to Cúchulainn and Mother Ireland in her many guises. The heroism of Cúchulainn and our betrayal and neglect of Mother Ireland came as a stimulus to the
revolutionaries. It should be stated that only
certain nationalist movements have shared these as driving myths. They have
been largely confined to the military ambitions of those who led 1916 and its
aftermath, the War of Independence and the long history of the IRA in all parts
of the Island of Ireland. The earlier foundation of the Celtic myths can be
found among the poets and academics of the 18th, 19th and
early 20th centuries and it was they who perhaps inadvertently
influenced the Fenians, the IBB, the Irish Volunteers and later the IRA. Hill
writes about the ‘dark shadows’ cast by these Irish myths, shadows which owe
their appearance to the failure of a comprehensive Irish national
identity. Other national movements
such as Home Rule and Griffith’s Sinn Féin could hardly be said to have been
too concerned by Irish myths.
His chapter on Ireland
may also be relevant to the different levels of psychic consciousness. Ireland is one of the few countries
which have a mythical history and ours is based on the five successive
invasions of the island, two of which preceded the Tuatha Dé Danann, the
Firbolgs and the final invasion of the Celts. These components of the Irish
historical myth may in the author’s opinion symbolise the levels of psychic consciousness,
‘’--- a psychic inheritance embedded in the land’’. The historical myths of our
country must surely be evoked in every Irishman who has long ago emigrated if
he hears the haunting notes of the Lark in the Clear Air or the Cuileann, or the voice of John
McCormack singing I Dreamt I dwelt in Marble Halls.
Hill states that
Yeats was one to rekindle the revolutionary spirit with his ‘a Terrible
Beauty is Born’. There were of course other
literary and political influences which led to 1916 and its 90 year aftermath, such
as the centenary celebrations of ’98, the sleeping dog of the Fenians and the
IRB, the Celtic Twilight. Our
myths were to lead to the divisive political and military consequences which
have lasted to this day. Pearse, initially a moderate supporting home rule as
late as 1912, became obsessed with Mother Ireland and Cúchulainn. These were to
lead to his blood sacrifice four years later, no doubt influenced by Tom
Clarke, who started his career in the late 19th century bombing the
English population, and Seán MacDermott who devoted his life to organising a
resurgent IRB and, with Tom Clarke, was long committed to a military
uprising. (MacDermott was to meet
my mother in 1915 and intended to marry her – RM.) These revolutionaries were
ably encouraged by the Irish Americans led by the old warrior, John Devoy of
Clan na nGael. In 1916 there were few who supported the rebellion but the
British played into the hands of the separatists by executing the leaders - and
so our home of nationalism became dysfunctional and scarred by conflicting ideologies.
No comments:
Post a Comment